Wynik wyszukiwania w bazie Polska Bibliografia Lekarska GBL

Zapytanie: KALLERT
Liczba odnalezionych rekordów: 2



Przejście do opcji zmiany formatu | Wyświetlenie wyników w wersji do druku
1/2

Tytuł oryginału: Leczenie w psychiatrycznych oddziałach dziennych w porównaniu z oddziałami całodobowymi w różnych europejskich systemach opieki zdrowotnej - założenia programu EDEN.
Tytuł angielski: Treatment in psychiatric day hospital in comparison with inpatient wards in different European health care system - objectives of EDEN project.
Autorzy: Kiejna Andrzej, Kallert Thomas W., Rymaszewska Joanna
Źródło: Psychiatr. Pol. 2002: 36 (6) supl.: X Gdańskie Dni Lecznictwa Psychiatrycznego s.361-367, bibliogr. 15 poz., sum. - 10 Gdańskie Dni Lecznictwa Psychiatrycznego Gdańsk 06. 2002
Sygnatura GBL: 305,130

Hasła klasyfikacyjne GBL:
  • psychiatria i psychologia
  • organizacja ochrony zdrowia

    Typ dokumentu:
  • praca związana ze zjazdem

    Streszczenie angielskie: The paper presents the objectives and design of an ongoing multicenter randomized, controlled trial EDEN (European Day Hospital Evaluation). The EDEN-study aims to evaluate the efficacy of acute psychiatric treatment in a day hospital setting in five European centers: Dresden, London, Michalovce, Prague and Wroclaw. The main hypothesis is that day hospital treatment for acute psychiatric patients is as effective as conventional inpatient hospital care. The tals for acute psychiatric treatment, to identify subgroups of patients with a more or less favourable outcome so tht the treatment setting might be spcifically applied and to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of day hospital treatment compared to conventional inpatient treatment. The study utilises a randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) design with repeated measures at a maximum of six time points: at admission (t1), one week aftr admission (t2) four weeks after admission (t3), discharge (t4), three months after discharge (t5), and 12 months after discharge (t6). A combination of well-established standardised assessment instruments and open questions is used in 6 time periods. If the findings accept the main hypothesis opf the study, some practical consequences could be inevitable: at a mental health policy level, these results could lead to an increase in the capacity of day hospitals; at the clinical level clinicians could redefine their concepts of care to consider the day hospital as an alternative yo conventional inpatient treatment; from economic point of view could lead to reduction of treatment costs.

    2/2

    Tytuł oryginału: Efficacy of psychiatric day hospital treatment: review of research findings and design of a European multi-centre study.
    Autorzy: Kallert T[homas] W., Schtzwohl M., Kiejna A., Nawka P., Priebe S., Raboch J.
    Źródło: Arch. Psychiatr. Psychother. 2002: 4 (2) s.55-71, tab., bibliogr. 75 poz.
    Sygnatura GBL: 313,554

    Hasła klasyfikacyjne GBL:
  • psychiatria i psychologia

    Typ dokumentu:
  • tytuł obcojęzyczny

    Wskaźnik treści:
  • ludzie

    Streszczenie angielskie: The paper presents a literature review of research findings on acute treatment in psychiatric day hospitals, and outlines the desing of an ongoing multi-site study on the effectiveness of acute day hospital treatment. The review is based on relevant older publications and recent randomised controlled trials comparing day hospital treatment with inpatient care. The findings suggest that (a) a wide range of patient groups are cared for in day hospitals, (b) both patients and their relatives assess day hospital treatment favourably, (c) treatment in day hospitals is at least as effective as inpatient care, and (d) day hospital treatment may lead to significant cost savings as compared to in-patient care. There are, however, a number of important questions that cannot be answered on the basis of the existing literature, and further research on the topic is warranted. The EDEN-study (European Day Hospital EvaluatioN) is a randomised controlled trial comparing day hospital treatment with conventional in-patient care and following the same protocol in five European countries (Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, Slovakia and United Kingdom). Aims and methods of the study are presented.

    stosując format: